Last weekend the state of Texas crowned its new high school soccer champions including Sharyland High School from Mission in the Rio Grande Valley area who overcame all odds to take the coveted 5A crown.
It was a great victory for a largely Hispanic community that saw a senior forward, Jesus Olivares, claim tournament MVP honors while freshman goalkeeper Jorge Medina had the poise and composure to emerge victorious from a nerve-wracking shootout.
Sharyland was a team that came together at the right time with players ranging from ages 15-18 who all grew up wanting to play for their high school team. But as the team boarded their bus to head from the tournament site in Georgetown back down to Mission, there was a sense that maybe an era was coming to an end.
With the US Soccer’s new mandate that young players must decide between playing for their club or high school team, the days of high school and college soccer feel threatened. Two of the four teams competing at the Texas state tournament were in fact victims of this mandate, having lost star players in the offseason. The question has now arisen whether or not the Sharylands or colleges like last year’s NCAA soccer champion, North Carolina, will still be relevant in the near future.
Claudio Reyna, the Youth Technical Director of US Soccer, who recently outlined his vision in an ESPN.com article, is himself a product of high school and college soccer, but is on a mission preaching that an alternative approach is better not only for young players but also for the US national team.
“Our decisions are not thought out to say, ‘Hey, how do we end high school soccer or how do we end college soccer, how do we steer kids away…’ It’s the bigger picture,” Reyna told 10 Kit. “Around the world, kids at these ages are training and playing 10 months out of the year. It’s a fact. That’s something that high school and college doesn’t provide.”
For college soccer coaches, it is an inconvenient truth that they really only receive four months in which to work with players. Add to the fact that most colleges play two games a week, it leaves little room for technical development each Fall. On top of everything else, there is of course the expectation within a school’s athletic department that its college soccer team actually has a winning program, development be darned.
“From a technical side, I do think college soccer needs to improve in how they play,” Reyna said. “A lot of times you hear that [the coach’s] job is on the line and they have to play this way and that’s disappointing to me. I think in college soccer if it was a better game and a better style, you might have more players. This [opinion] is coming from the players. They say that college soccer or high school soccer holds back my development.”
For years college soccer was essentially the only choice for young players but now with the advent of the US Development Academies, including those academies affiliated with MLS teams, there is a path to a professional career that for the first time mirrors what is done in soccer-rich countries all around the world.
“College soccer is always going to be there,” Reyna said. “I think it’s great in what it provides a kid and it still is a stepping stone for professionals. But I think you start to see that players have decisions to make and I think that’s good. There’s competition. But we don’t go around telling players not to go to college. We just feel because there is more training and more quality games spread out over a long period that it is better for the body physically. In speaking to experts around the world, it doesn’t take me a long time to have them tell me, ‘Yeah, that’s the way to do it.’”
Whether Reyna’s vision is fulfilled remains to be seen. However one thing is for certain is that soccer on high school and college campuses has forever been affected, for better or for worse.
by Arch Bell